These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Precision of navigation-assisted surgery of the thoracic and lumbar spine].
    Author: Arand M, Schempf M, Hebold D, Teller S, Kinzl L, Gebhard F.
    Journal: Unfallchirurg; 2003 Nov; 106(11):899-906. PubMed ID: 14634732.
    Abstract:
    The goal of these studies was to evaluate the accuracy of in vivo and in vitro application of CT- and C-arm-based navigation at the thoracic and lumbar spine. With CT based navigation, 82 pedicle screws were consecutively inserted, 53 into the thoracic and 29 into the lumbar spine. Seven (13%) perforations were detected at the thoracic spine and two (7%) at the lumbar spine. Additionally, minor perforations below the thread depth were seen in six (11%) thoracic and in two (7%) lumbar instrumentation. With C-arm-based navigation, 74 screws were consecutively placed into 38 thoracic and 36 lumbar pedicles. Perforations were noted in ten (26%) thoracic and four (11%) lumbar implants. Minor perforations were observed in another nine (24%) thoracic and ten (28%) lumbar pedicles. The observer-independent and standardized in vitro study based on a transpedicular 3.2-mm drill hole aiming a 4-mm steel ball in a plastic bone model showed pedicle perforations of the drill canal only in thoracic vertebrae, 1 of 15 in CT-based and 3 of 15 in C-arm navigation. The quantitative calculation of the smallest distance between the central line through the drill canal and the center of the steel ball resulted in 1.4 mm (0.5-4.8 mm) for the CT-based navigation at the thoracic spine and in 1.8 mm (0.5-3 mm) at the lumbar spine. For the C-arm based navigation the distance was 2.6 mm (0.9-4.8 mm) for the thoracic spine and 2 mm (1.2-3 mm) for the lumbar spine. In our opinion, the clinical results of the comparative accuracy of CT- and C-arm-based navigation in the present study showed moderate advantages of the CT-based technique in the thoracic spine, whereas CT- and C-arm based navigation had comparable perforation rates at the lumbar pedicle. The results of the experimental study correlated with the clinical data.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]