These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pressure controlled-inverse ratio ventilation and pulmonary gas exchange during lower abdominal surgery.
    Author: Tweed WA, Tan PL.
    Journal: Can J Anaesth; 1992 Dec; 39(10):1036-40. PubMed ID: 1464129.
    Abstract:
    Although pressure controlled-inverse ratio ventilation (PC-IRV) has been used successfully in the treatment of respiratory failure, it has not been applied to the treatment of respiratory dysfunction during anaesthesia. With PC-IRV the inspiratory wave form is fundamentally altered so that inspiratory time is prolonged (inverse I:E), inspiratory flow rate is low, and the peak inspiratory pressure is limited. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can be applied and the mean airway pressure is higher than with conventional ventilation. To assess the clinical efficacy of this new mode of ventilation we studied ten patients having lower abdominal gynaecologic surgery in the Trendelenburg position under general anaesthesia. Pulmonary O2 exchange was determined during four steady states: awake control (AC), after 30 and 60 min of PC-IRV during surgery, and at the end of surgery. Patients' lungs were ventilated with air/O2 by a Siemens 900C servo ventilator in the PC-IRV mode with an I:E ratio of 2:1 and 5 cm H2O of PEEP. The FIO2 was controlled at 0.5 and arterial blood gases were used to calculate the oxygen tension-based indices of gas exchange. There were significant increases of (A-a) DO2 at 30 and 60 min (41 and 43%). These changes were less than those reported in a previous study using conventional tidal volume ventilation (7.5 ml.kg-1) and were similar to those in patients whose lungs were ventilated with high tidal volumes (12.7 ml.kg-1). Thus, in this clinical model of compromised gas exchange, arterial oxygenation was better with PC-IRV than with conventional ventilation, but not better than with large tidal volume ventilation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]