These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Registered and unregistered patients in general practice: implications for primary health organisations.
    Author: Tomlin A, Martin I.
    Journal: N Z Med J; 2003 Nov 21; 116(1186):U684. PubMed ID: 14657967.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: To describe differences between registered and unregistered patients in New Zealand general practice and assess patient registers prior to enrollment in primary health organisations (PHOs). METHODS: Patient records from 35 computerised general practices made up the study data set. Data were assessed for the year 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2001. Patient registers and consultation files were examined to determine levels of recording of demographic data, consulting rates and date of last contact with practice for registered and unregistered patients. Prescription medications were coded to therapeutic groups for both patient groups. RESULTS: Sixty seven per cent of patients were listed as not registered with their practice. Only 10% of unregistered patients consulted during the study year. At least 20% of all patients had no contact with their practice in the last three years. A high proportion of unregistered patients were aged 15-34 years. Unregistered patients were likely to be treated for minor ailments. CONCLUSIONS: Unregistered patients constitute a distinct patient sub-population, with fewer holders of community service cards and high user health cards than registered patients, and they have a different age/sex profile. A substantial number of patients, both registered and unregistered, have had no contact with their practice in the last three years. Patient registers will require considerable updating prior to PHO enrollment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]