These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Quantitative cerebral blood flow measurements in the rat using a beta-probe and H2 15O.
    Author: Weber B, Späth N, Wyss M, Wild D, Burger C, Stanley R, Buck A.
    Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2003 Dec; 23(12):1455-60. PubMed ID: 14663341.
    Abstract:
    Beta-probes are a relatively new tool for tracer kinetic studies in animals. They are highly suited to evaluate new positron emission tomography tracers or measure physiologic parameters at rest and after some kind of stimulation or intervention. In many of these experiments, the knowledge of CBF is highly important. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the method of CBF measurements using a beta-probe and H2 15O. CBF was measured in the barrel cortex of eight rats at baseline and after acetazolamide challenge. Trigeminal nerve stimulation was additionally performed in five animals. In each category, three injections of 250 to 300 MBq H2 15O were performed at 10-minute intervals. Data were analyzed using a standard one-tissue compartment model (K1 = CBF, k2 = CBF/p, where p is the partition coefficient). Values for K1 were 0.35 +/- 0.09, 0.58 +/- 0.16, and 0.49 +/- 0.03 mL x min(-1) x mL(-1) at rest, after acetazolamide challenge, and during trigeminal nerve stimulation, respectively. The corresponding values for k2 were 0.55 +/- 0.12, 0.94 +/- 0.16, and 0.85 +/- 0.12 min(-7), and for p were 0.64 +/- 0.05, 0.61 +/- 0.07, and 0.59 +/- 0.06. The standard deviation of the difference between two successive experiments, a measure for the reproducibility of the method, was 10.1%, 13.0%, and 5.7% for K1, k2, and p, respectively. In summary, beta-probes in conjunction with H2 15O allow the reproducible quantitative measurement of CBF, although some systematic underestimation seems to occur, probably because of partial volume effects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]