These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Minimally invasive thoracic surgery versus standard surgery].
    Author: Sollitto F, De Palma A, Lopez C, Loizzi M.
    Journal: Ann Ital Chir; 2003; 74(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 14677287.
    Abstract:
    Advances in technology, with the availability of optics and minitelevision cameras and improved endoscopic instrumentation (especially endo-stapler devices), have allowed the surgeon to obtain a superior panoramic view of the thoracic cavity and an optimal surgical manuvrability. This has determined the development, besides the traditional thoracotomic approach, of minimally invasive techniques of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). An auxiliary mini-thoracotomic approach and the magnification of the operating theatre, which allows the surgeon to accomplish difficult manoeuvres under diret view, have progressively extended the indications of this procedure: at first used for the treatment of pneumothorax and pleural effusions, it is now employed in biopsy or atypical resection of pulmonary nodules, lung cancer staging and diagnostic-therapeutical procedures of mediastinal diseases, major pulmonary resections (lobectomy and pneumonectomy) and lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema (LVRS). The Authors review minimally invasive techniques of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), compared to the traditional surgical ones, for the treatment of various thoracic diseases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]