These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Treatment of stones in caliceal diverticula: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy.
    Author: Hendrikx AJ, Bierkens AF, Bos R, Oosterhof GO, Debruyne FM.
    Journal: Br J Urol; 1992 Nov; 70(5):478-82. PubMed ID: 1467848.
    Abstract:
    Stones in caliceal diverticula may cause symptoms for which treatment is indicated. Both extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PNL) are recommended. We have evaluated the results of ESWL treatment of stone-containing caliceal diverticula and compared these with the results obtained by percutaneous surgery. In the ESWL group, 15 patients were treated with an electromagnetic lithotriptor (Siemens Lithostar). After 3 months, plain abdominal X-rays revealed that only 2 patients were both stone-free and symptom-free. Of the 13 patients with residual fragments, 7 had no symptoms. The remaining 6 were treated by a lower pole resection (n = 3), a percutaneous procedure (n = 2) and long-term administration of antibiotics (n = 1). Sixteen patients were treated percutaneously. Puncture failed in 3 and they underwent a lumbotomy. In the remaining 13 patients the stones were reached by direct puncture (n = 12) or via an adjacent calix (n = 1). After 3 months, 10 patients were stone-free and had no symptoms. Morbidity consisted of post-operative bleeding (n = 3) and high fever (n = 1). It was concluded that caution should be exercised in the treatment of stone-containing caliceal diverticula. Only in symptomatic cases is treatment indicated and ESWL is the first choice. If ESWL fails (residual stones and persistent symptoms), PNL should be performed, although it is associated with a higher morbidity rate.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]