These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A retrospective cohort study of correlates of response to pharmacologic therapy for hyperlipidemia in members of a managed care organization.
    Author: Valuck RJ, Williams SA, MacArthur M, Saseen JJ, Nair KV, McCollum M, Ensor JE.
    Journal: Clin Ther; 2003 Nov; 25(11):2936-57. PubMed ID: 14693317.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the effectiveness of statins in a managed care setting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify demographic, clinical, and pharmacotherapy-related factors associated with response to drug therapy for hyperlipidemia among members of a managed care organization. METHODS: Claims data from a large US managed care organization from July 1, 1998, through June 30, 2000, were analyzed for adult members with continuous enrollment, >or=1 prescription drug claim, >or=2 sets of fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) laboratory results, and no lipid-lowering prescription claims at any time <or=12 months before the date of the first set of LDL-C laboratory results. Relative lipid-lowering regimen efficacy categories were created based on percentage reduction in LDL-C listed in product package inserts (low, <or=30%; moderate, 31%-40%; high, >or=41%). Multiple regression and logistic regression models were developed to identify significant predictors of percentage change in LDL-C from baseline and of >or=10% reduction in LDL-C. RESULTS: A total of 6247 members met the inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age was 59.6 (12.4) years (range, 21-93 years), and 3003 individuals (48.1%) were women. Furthermore, 337 members (5.4%) received high-efficacy statins, 2633 (42.1%) received moderate-efficacy statins, 934 (15.0%) received low-efficacy statins, and 86 (1.4%) received low-efficacy lipid-lowering drugs from other therapeutic classes during the study period. Compliance with therapy was high (range, 85%-92%), and upward titration of therapy was found in only 160 members (2.6%). Multiple regression analysis indicated that receiving statin therapy compared with other lipid-lowering therapy was a significant predictor of percentage reduction in LDL-C (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that compared with high-efficacy statin regimens, low-efficacy statin regimens (odds ratio [OR] = 0.619; 95% CI, 0.436-0.877) and low-efficacy regimens from other therapeutic classes (OR = 0.171; 95% CI, 0.099-0.295) were less effective in lowering LDL-C by >or=10%. Similar results were observed for subanalyses of subjects with diabetes mellitus or coronary heart disease (CHD); individuals who received more efficacious statin regimens were more likely to reach the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II LDL-C goal of <or=100 mg/dL (P < 0.05 for moderate- or low-efficacy regimens vs high-efficacy statins in each model). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that improvement is needed in hyperlipidemia management, especially in identification and use of lipid-lowering therapy in individuals at high risk for CHD.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]