These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [The fate of patients with intermittent claudication-comparison of surgical and non-surgical treatment].
    Author: Fujioka K, Toyota S, Furutani A, Akiyama N, Yoshimura K, Seyama K, Esato K.
    Journal: Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Sep; 93(9):1043-5. PubMed ID: 1470113.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study was to determine the operative indication for patients with intermittent claudication because of arteriosclerosis obliterans, and to compare the late result of the surgical treatment group (182 cases, 250 limbs) with that of the non-surgical treatment group (35 cases, 43 limbs). There were 3 operative deaths and 34 late deaths in the surgical group, and 14 late deaths in the non-surgical group. The number one cause of death was heart failure, including ischemic heart disease, in both groups. The 4-year cumulative patency rates were 91% in the aorto-iliac, 71% in the femoro-distal and 79% in the aorto-femoro-distal arterial reconstructions. Long term symptom free rates of the surgical group and the non-surgical group, except fatal case, were 83% and 44% in the aorto-iliac, 79% and 27% in the femoro-distal, 87% and 33% in the aorto-femoro-distal arterial regions, respectively. Late result of intermittent claudication in the surgical group was better than that in the non-surgical group. We concluded that intermittent claudication should be considered to be the indication for surgery, except for the cases with high risk diseases or malignant diseases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]