These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Health economic consequences of the use of irbesartan in patients in Germany with type 2 diabetes, nephropathy and hypertension].
    Author: Palmer AJ, Annemans L, Roze S, Lamotte M, Rodby RA, Ritz E.
    Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan 02; 129(1-2):13-8. PubMed ID: 14703575.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The "Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial" (IDNT), demonstrated a reduction in the combined endpoint of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death compared to control or amlodipine arms in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy when treated with irbesartan. Aim of this study is to compare long-term consequences in costs and outcomes of IDNT treatment alternatives from the German health care system's perspective. METHODS: A Markov model simulated progression from overt nephropathy to doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, and death in patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy for the three treatment arms. Treatment-specific probabilities were derived from IDNT. German-specific ESRD-related data were retrieved from published sources to reflect local management practices, ESRD outcomes and costs. A time horizon of 10 years was used. Delay in onset of ESRD and mean costs per patient were calculated. Future costs were discounted at 5 % per annum. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of ESRD after 10 years with irbesartan (36 %) is lower compared to amlodipine (49 %) or control (45 %). Irbesartan leads to cost savings of 14 424 EUR and 8 720 EUR per patient versus amlodipine or control respectively. CONCLUSION: Treating patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and nephropathy using irbesartan lowers the cumulative incidence of ESRD and is cost-saving compared to amlodipine or control.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]