These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias in clinical studies for Alzheimer's disease.
    Author: Zhou XH, Castelluccio P.
    Journal: Stat Med; 2004 Jan 30; 23(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 14716724.
    Abstract:
    A common problem for comparing the relative accuracy of two screening tests for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a two-stage design study is verification bias. If the verification bias can be assumed to be ignorable, Zhou and Higgs have proposed a maximum likelihood approach to compare the relative accuracy of screening tests in a two-stage design study. However, if the verification mechanism also depends on the unobserved disease status, the ignorable assumption does not hold. In this paper, we discuss how to use a profile likelihood approach to compare the relative accuracy of two screening tests for AD without assuming the ignorable verification bias mechanism.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]