These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Novel mutations in the cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein gene (RLBP1) associated with retinitis punctata albescens: evidence of interfamilial genetic heterogeneity and fundus changes in heterozygotes.
    Author: Fishman GA, Roberts MF, Derlacki DJ, Grimsby JL, Yamamoto H, Sharon D, Nishiguchi KM, Dryja TP.
    Journal: Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 122(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 14718298.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the molecular genetic defects associated with retinitis punctata albescens (RPA) in 5 patients from 3 families with this disease. METHODS: We examined 3 probands and 2 clinically affected relatives with RPA. Clinical examinations included best-corrected visual acuity, visual field testing, electroretinography, dilated fundus examination, and fundus photography. Leukocyte DNA was analyzed for mutations in the exons of the genes encoding cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein 1 (RLBP1), 11-cis-retinol dehydrogenase (RDH5), interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (RBP3), and photoreceptor all-trans-retinol dehydrogenase (RDH8). Not all patients were evaluated for mutations in each gene. The exons were individually amplified and screened for mutations by single-stranded conformational polymorphism analysis or direct genomic sequencing. RESULTS: The 3 probands had similar clinical findings, including a history of poor night vision, the presence of punctate white deposits in the retina, and substantially reduced or absent rod responses on electroretinogram testing. One of the probands (patient 2:III:2) had 2 novel mutations in the RLBP1 gene (Arg151Trp and Gly31[2-base pair deletion], [GGA-->G-]). Segregation analysis showed that the 2 mutations were allelic and that the patient was a compound heterozygote. Both parents of the proband manifested round white deposits in the retina. The other 2 probands had no detected pathogenic mutations in RLBP1 or in the other 3 genes evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of novel RLBP1 mutations in 1 of our 3 probands, all with RPA, is further evidence of genetic (nonallelic) heterogeneity in this disease. The presence of round white deposits in the retina may be observed in those heterozygous for RLBP1. Clinical Relevance Patients with a clinical presentation of RPA can have genetically different mutations. Drusen-like lesions may be observed in heterozygotes in families with this disease and a mutation in RLBP1.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]