These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Acute uncomplicated UTI and E. coli resistance: implications for first-line empirical antibiotic therapy.
    Author: Perfetto EM, Keating K, Merchant S, Nichols BR.
    Journal: J Manag Care Pharm; 2004; 10(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 14720102.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) typically affects immunocompetent, anatomically normal women. Escherichia coli (E. coli) accounts for approximately 80% of cases. Given increased E. coli-trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) resistance, practice guidelines advocate first-line alternatives based on local resistance rates above 10%. This paper provides a model incorporating use of a new extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin, used once daily, to facilitate revision of uUTI treatment policies by managed care organizations (MCOs) and practitioners. METHODS: A cost-minimization model was designed from the MCO perspective, assuming an initial office visit with a urinalysis and empiric, 3-day treatment (TMP-SMX 800/160 mg twice daily or ciprofloxacin XR 500 mg once daily). Persistent infections were assumed to require a second visit. Costs were provided by a major employee health and benefit plan provider; clinical data were based on published information. Five case scenarios were used to compare average treatment costs based on varying E. coli resistance rates to therapy and to identify rates of TMP-SMX resistance where total treatment costs are equal. RESULTS: Using national surveillance resistance data, Case 1 demonstrated average cost savings of 9.59 dollars to 10.21 dollars with ciprofloxacin XR. In Case 2, treatment costs (49.19 dollars) were equal at an E. coli resistance rate of 4.3% for TMP-SMX and 1.0% for ciprofloxacin. Case 3 assumed empiric telephone prescribing, demonstrating that, at 4.3% TMP-SMX resistance, costs are equal for both treatments (4.19 dollars). Case 4 used real-world data on therapy duration, demonstrating that, at 2.8% TMP-SMX resistance, costs are equal for both treatments (54.87 dollars). Case 5 assumed 10% ciprofloxacin-E. coli resistance; at 13.3% TMP-SMX resistance, treatment costs were equal (57.50 dollars). Results from all cases demonstrate that while the per-dose cost of ciprofloxacin XR far exceeds TMP-SMX, average total treatment costs are lower for ciprofloxacin XR at expected local levels of E. coli resistance to TMP-SMX. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that in areas where local TMP-SMX E. coli resistance exceeds 10% and resistance to ciprofloxacin remains low, (0.5% to 6%) ciprofloxacin XR is an appropriate alternative to standard empiric treatment. The data provide evidence to MCOs that switching to a more expensive per-dose alternative will not necessarily increase total costs when guideline recommendations are followed. Responsible use of antibiotics for uUTI requires selection and administration of the right dosage of the most suitable antibiotic for an appropriate time period to eliminate pathogens quickly and successfully. The decision to use an alternative first-line therapy for uUTI should be driven by local resistance and susceptibility data--not simply per-dose drug acquisition costs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]