These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Amphotericin B treatment for Indian visceral leishmaniasis: conventional versus lipid formulations.
    Author: Sundar S, Mehta H, Suresh AV, Singh SP, Rai M, Murray HW.
    Journal: Clin Infect Dis; 2004 Feb 01; 38(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 14727208.
    Abstract:
    In Bihar, India, where visceral leishmaniasis is hyperendemic, amphotericin B deoxycholate is now first-line parenteral treatment. To test the efficacy of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus that of its lipid formulations, Indian patients were randomized to receive treatment with amphotericin B deoxycholate (1 mg/kg on alternate days for 30 days; n=51), liposomal amphotericin B (2 mg/kg per day for 5 days; n=51), or amphotericin B lipid complex (2 mg/kg per day for 5 days; n=51). Infusion-associated reactions were frequent and persistent in subjects treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate. The illness of 3 patients failed to respond to treatment, and 5 patients experienced relapse. Final cure rates were similar. Estimated total treatment costs for a 25-kg patient-417 dollars for amphotericin B deoxycholate, 872 dollars for liposomal amphotericin B, and 947 dollars for amphotericin B lipid complex-differed as a result of drug cost. Substantial reductions (approximately 60%) in the price of liposomal amphotericin B and amphotericin B lipid complex would make treatment costs comparable to that of amphotericin B deoxycholate, permitting administration of short-course regimens in India.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]