These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Increasing recruitment of quality students to obstetrics and gynecology: impact of a structured clerkship. Author: Dunn TS, Wolf D, Beuler J, Coddington CC. Journal: Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):339-41. PubMed ID: 14754705. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the satisfaction of the third-year medical students with their basic third-year obstetrics and gynecology rotation before and after a concerted effort was made to improve the rotation with prompt feedback and problem-based case learning. METHODS: At the end of each rotation, third-year medical students were asked to anonymously fill out an "in-house" course evaluation. A 1-5 rating scale to evaluate quality of teaching, instructor's commitment and enthusiasm, and enhancement of professional development was used. Scores were compared over 4 years, and a Wilcoxon rank sum analysis was performed to determine significance. Evaluations were compared for 1999 and 2000, which were the 2 years before the initiation of the structured rotation, with 2001 and 2002, the first 2 years of the new approach's implementation. RESULTS: Sixty third-year students were evaluated. The students noted that the quality of teaching improved (P <.002), the instructors' commitment and enthusiasm increased (P <.001), instructors enhanced the student's professional development (P <.001), and students perceived faculty as positive role models (P <.001). It is noteworthy that between the years 1999 and 2000, the number of students interested in obstetrics and gynecology was 3 and 4, respectively, whereas in 2001 and 2002, the first 2 years after implementation of the new process, 6 and 7 students, respectively, were interested in this field. CONCLUSION: Students' satisfaction with their third-year clerkship improved with a structured program and increased faculty involvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]