These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of training status and exercise intensity on phase II VO2 kinetics.
    Author: Koppo K, Bouckaert J, Jones AM.
    Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Feb; 36(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 14767244.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To test the hypotheses that: 1) the time constant for the fast component of .VO2 kinetics (tau1) at exercise onset would be faster in trained than in untrained subjects for both moderate and heavy exercise, and that 2) tau1 would become progressively slower in untrained subjects at higher power outputs but be invariant in trained subjects. METHODS: Eight untrained subjects (.VO2peak: 42.9 +/- 5.1 mL.kg-1.min-1) and seven trained cyclists (.VO2peak: 66.6 +/- 2.5 mL.kg-1.min-1) completed square-wave transitions to power outputs requiring 60% and 80% of gas exchange threshold (GET), and 50% of the difference between GET and .VO2 peak (50%Delta) from a baseline of "unloaded" cycling. .VO2 was measured breath-by-breath and individual responses were modeled using nonlinear regression techniques. RESULTS: A repeated measures ANOVA revealed that the tau1 was significantly smaller (i.e., the kinetics were faster) in the trained compared with the untrained subjects and that tau1 became significantly greater (i.e., the kinetics were slowed) at higher power outputs both in the untrained (60%GET: 17.8 +/- 3.8 s, 80%GET: 21.5 +/- 6.6 s, and 50%Delta: 23.5 +/- 2.8 s) and the trained (60%GET: 8.9 +/- 1.3 s, 80%GET: 11.7 +/- 2.5 s, and 50%Delta: 15.2 +/- 2.0 s) subjects (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Phase II .VO2 kinetics became progressively slower at higher power outputs in both trained and untrained subjects. That a greater tau1 was evident at a higher power output within the moderate exercise intensity domain (<GET), where O2 availability is presumed not to be limiting, indicates that the slowing of the phase II .VO2 kinetics may be attributed to other factors besides O2 availability such as the recruitment of higher threshold motor units.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]