These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.
    Author: Trevisan C, Gandolini GG, Sibilla P, Penotti M, Caraceni MP, Ortolani S.
    Journal: J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7(12):1373-82. PubMed ID: 1481723.
    Abstract:
    Interunit variability among bone densitometers is due to different factors, including different calibration procedures and algorithms and variability in photon source energies and/or intensities. Other factors, such as the choice of scan parameters or the analysis procedures, can also introduce variability. The new generation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has partially improved this situation. The aim of this study was to investigate the operator-dependent analysis procedures that can affect scan results and to evaluate the phantom and in vivo interunit variation of some DXA instruments. Four DXA instruments (QDR 1000 and 1000/W, Hologic, Inc.) were used. Potential sources of variability in the analysis procedures of anteroposterior lumbar spine and hip scans were considered: in most cases these procedures significantly influenced scan results. On lumbar spine, an enlargement of the scan window of less than 3 cm was responsible for an average increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of about 3%. On the hip, lowering the scan window by about 1 cm accounted for an increase in the whole-segment BMD of about 4%. After standardization of analysis procedures, interunit and intraunit coefficients of variation and percentage differences among instruments were less than 1% for all the parameters considered (area and bone mineral content and density) with both an anatomic and a geometric phantom, and in nine subjects scanned by two different devices the percentage difference in BMD was greater than 2%. This study shows that present interunit variability allows comparisons among laboratories, but only if highly standardized analysis procedures are used.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]