These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of four different contraceptive vaginal rings: steroid serum levels, luteal activity, bleeding control and lipid profiles.
    Author: Alvarez-Sanchez F, Brache V, Jackanicz T, Faundes A.
    Journal: Contraception; 1992 Oct; 46(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 1486777.
    Abstract:
    Four different models of contraceptive vaginal rings were tested during three cycles for luteal activity, bleeding control, plasma lipoproteins and serum levels of the contraceptive steroids. Two progestins, levonorgestrel acetate (LNGA) and ST 1435, alone or in combination with ethynyl-estradiol (EE) were tested. The rings released 100 ug/day of the progestins and 30 ug/day of EE. Luteal activity was detected among users of the progestin-only rings: 4 of 8 cycles with ST 1435 and 2 of 10 with LNGA. Only one of the 18 cycles studied with the two combined rings showed luteal activity, but the measurement of contraceptive steroid in plasma suggested that this subject delayed reinsertion of the ring for about one week in that particular cycle. Breakthrough bleeding was observed in 12 of 30 cycles of use of the progestin-only rings, and in only 2 of 27 cycles with the combined models. No significant changes in total cholesterol or its HDL-fraction were observed. However, the only reduction observed in HDL-cholesterol was among users of the LNGA-only ring. It is concluded that the two combined CVR models offer good possibilities of high effectiveness and bleeding control and merit further development. Researchers analyzed data on 20 18-38 year old volunteers from the family planning clinic of PROFAMILIA in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, who had earlier undergone female sterilization to evaluate 4 different models of contraceptive vaginal rings during 3 cycles so as to identify which models would be the most likely to be an acceptable, safe, and effective family planning method. Women who used either of the 2 combined rings (ethinyl estradiol [EE] and either levonorgestrel acetate [LNGA] or ST 1435) had higher mean total serum levonorgestrel levels than those using the progestin-only rings (LNGA or ST 1435) (most were significant at .005). Luteal activity which marked ovulation was basically limited to users of the progestin-only rings (50% of cycles with ST 1435 and 20% of LNGA). It occurred in 1 of 18 cycles (5.6%) of users of combined rings (LNGA + EE). It probably occurred because of delayed insertion. The combined rings caused fewer incidents of breakthrough bleeding than did the progestin-only rings (7.4% vs. 40%). Neither the progestin-only nor the combined vaginal rings significantly altered total cholesterol or high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Users of the LNGA-only ring did experience an insignificant reduction in HDL, however. Further, triglycerides increased among users of the combined vaginal rings, but the increase was only significant with the LNGA + EE ring (25.4 mg/dl increase; p .05). Moreover, they fell significantly among users of the LNGA only ring (45.5 mg/dl decrease; p .05). The researchers concluded that the 2 combined rings hold the most promise due to good bleeding control and high effectiveness and therefore deserve further development.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]