These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A TNFR1 genotype with a protective role in familial rheumatoid arthritis.
    Author: Dieudé P, Osorio J, Petit-Teixeira E, Moreno S, Garnier S, Cailleau-Moindrault S, Stalens C, Lasbleiz S, Bardin T, Prum B, Cornélis F, European Consortium on Rheumatoid Arthritis Families.
    Journal: Arthritis Rheum; 2004 Feb; 50(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 14872483.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Results of genome scans in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have suggested that the tumor necrosis factor receptor I (TNFRI) and TNFRII loci (TNFR1 and TNFR2) are susceptibility loci. A TNFR2 polymorphism was found to be associated with familial RA. TNFR1 is mutated in TNFR-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). We undertook this study to test the TNFR1 exonic polymorphism closest to the TRAPS mutations site (+36 A/G) for association with RA. METHODS: DNA samples were available from two groups of the French Caucasian population: 1) 100 families with 1 RA patient and both parents and 2) 86 RA index patients from families with at least 2 siblings with RA (affected sibpairs [ASPs]). The +36 A/G polymorphism of TNFR1 was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The analysis was performed using the transmission disequilibrium test, the genotype relative risk, and a linkage-based test previously described. RESULTS: A negative association between RA and the +36 A/A genotype, suggested in the first sample (P = 0.084), was demonstrated in the second (ASP RA) sample (odds ratio [OR] 0.465; P = 0.012) and confirmed by the linkage-based test (OR 0.17; P = 0.008). The protective genotype, present in 41% of controls, was less frequent in RA patients: 33% in the first sample, 24% in the ASP RA sample, and 11% in the linkage-derived subgroup. Distribution of both TNFR2 196 R/R and TNFR1 +36 A/A genotypes in the ASP RA sample showed that both suspected genotypes were exclusive. CONCLUSION: We found evidence for an association between RA and a TNFR1 protective genotype, restricted to familial RA. Distribution of the TNFR2 196 R/R and TNFR1 +36 A/A genotypes in familial RA could suggest an interaction between TNFR1 and TNFR2 in the genetic susceptibility for RA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]