These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Identification of the substrate-binding exosites of two snake venom serine proteinases: molecular basis for the partition of two essential functions of thrombin.
    Author: Maroun RC, Serrano SM.
    Journal: J Mol Recognit; 2004; 17(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 14872537.
    Abstract:
    The venom of the South American snake Bothrops jararaca contains two serine proteinases, bothrombin and the platelet-aggregating enzyme PA-BJ, which share 66% sequence identity. Each of these proteinases possesses one of the two essential procoagulant functions of thrombin-the clotting of fibrinogen and platelet aggregation. Thus, bothrombin clots fibrinogen but has no direct effect on platelets, unless in the presence of exogenous fibrinogen. PA-BJ induces platelet aggregation by interacting with the protease-activated platelet receptor without clotting fibrinogen. On the other hand, thrombin possesses two extended surfaces. One is composed of basic and hydrophobic residues (exosite I) and the other one of basic residues only (exosite II). These exosites are involved in the recognition of physiological macromolecular substrates. In order to identify the corresponding exosites in bothrombin and PA-BJ and understand the molecular basis of the partition of the two procoagulant functions of thrombin among the two snake venom enzymes, we used molecular modeling to obtain models of their complexes with their natural substrates fibrinogen and a fragment of the protease-activated platelet receptor, respectively. In analogy to thrombin, each of the enzymes presents two exosites. Nonetheless, the exosites contain a smaller proportion of basic residues than thrombin does (45-72%), reducing thus the functional diversity of the enzymes. In addition, the composition of exosite I is different in both enzymes. We identify those residues in exosite I that could contribute to the differences in specificity. Finally, allostery does not seem to mediate macromolecular substrate recognition by these enzymes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]