These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Pediatric surgery. A comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia].
    Author: Kokki H, Hendolin H, Vainio J, Partanen J.
    Journal: Anaesthesist; 1992 Dec; 41(12):765-8. PubMed ID: 1489075.
    Abstract:
    Forty patients aged 2 to 5 years who were admitted for paediatric operations were randomly assigned to have either spinal or general anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia was achieved with isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg. General anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 2-5 mg/kg and continued with low-dose fentanyl (1-2 micrograms/kg, oxygen/nitrous oxide/isoflurane (30/70/0.1-0.5%), vecuronium normoventilating the patients. The time spent in the operation room was shorter in the spinal anaesthesia group because the children were awake and could immediately be transferred. The haemodynamic pattern and respiratory function were stable during spinal anaesthesia. After general anaesthesia, respiratory function deteriorated as indicated by arterial desaturation (< 90%), which was detected in 11 of the 20 patients after general anaesthesia. Vomiting (2), sore throat (4) and micturition difficulties (2) were the adverse events associated with general anaesthesia. Three patients were restless after spinal anaesthesia. It can be concluded that spinal anaesthesia is a suitable anaesthetic technique for paediatric surgery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]