These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Lumbosacral nerve root stimulation comparing electrical with surface magnetic coil techniques.
    Author: Macdonell RA, Cros D, Shahani BT.
    Journal: Muscle Nerve; 1992 Aug; 15(8):885-90. PubMed ID: 1495504.
    Abstract:
    Stimulation of lumbosacral nerve roots using a monopolar needle electrode was compared with magnetic stimulation using a 7-cm diameter surface coil. Compound muscle action potentials were recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) and flexor hallucis brevis (FHB) muscles. Although the mean latency of CMAPs did not differ using the two techniques, amplitudes were considerably larger using a needle. Mean amplitudes were 66% (TA) and 64% (FHB) of the direct M response obtained by distal, supramaximal stimulation compared with mean values using maximal magnetic coil stimulation of 36% (TA) and 25% (FHB). Minimum F-wave latencies from FHB were used to estimate the site of nerve root stimulation using both techniques. Although there was a large amount of variability in the data from individual subjects, the results suggested that, on the average, both forms of stimulation act proximal to the intervertebral foramen. We conclude that a needle electrode is a more suitable technique for stimulating lumbosacral nerve roots.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]