These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Standardized counting of particles in the urine: a comparison between flow cytometry, cell chamber counting and traditional sediment analysis]. Author: Ottiger C, Regeniter A, Köchli HP, Huber AR. Journal: Praxis (Bern 1994); 2004 Jan 07; 93(1-2):15-21. PubMed ID: 14964040. Abstract: We compared the number of particles in the urine with flow cytometry and manual methods: cell chamber and standardised sediment analysis. The correlation (r) between the KOVA-cell chamber and the flow cytometer UF-100 was 0.966 for erythrocytes, 0.935 for leukocytes and 0.902 for squamous epithelial cells. Similar results were obtained by a standardised preparation of the sediment. Today, the estimation of the cell number in the sediment analysis is still common. The KOVA cell chamber system is a cheap alternative for microscopy, whereas automation with flow cytometry is only used for large laboratories. Reference values were established under optimal conditions (erythrocytes < 14/microliter, leukocytes < 16/microliter) with a cut-off of 20/microliter.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]