These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sex-specific fetal weight prediction by ultrasound.
    Author: Schild RL, Sachs C, Fimmers R, Gembruch U, Hansmann M.
    Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 14970995.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To improve sonographic birth-weight prediction by developing fetal gender-specific formulae. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Two gender-specific formulae were produced from the data of 527 patients and the data of a further 349 patients were used to evaluate the formulae. Inclusion criteria were a singleton live fetus, gestational age above 25 weeks, birth weight between 1000 g and 4500 g and fetal biometry within 8 days of delivery. Data retrieval was specifically for the purpose of this study. RESULTS: To yield the best-fit weight formula for each fetal gender we employed step-wise regression analysis based on fractional polynomials with the biometric parameters biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), transverse abdominal diameter (TAD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL): estimated fetal weight for girls (g) = - 4035.275 + 1.143 x BPD3 + 1159.878 x AC1/2 + 10.079 x FL3 - 81.277 x FL2 [in cm]; estimated fetal weight for boys (g) = 43576.579 + 1913.853 x log10BPD + 0.01323 x HC3 + 55.532 x AC2 - 13602.664 x AC1/2 - 0.721 x AC3 + 2.31 x FL3 [in cm]. These formulae showed superior results compared with those of conventional weight formulae. CONCLUSION: Gender-related fetal weight calculation allows optimized prediction of fetal weight at birth.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]