These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Modulation of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition during motor imagery is task-dependent.
    Author: Stinear CM, Byblow WD.
    Journal: Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 14997259.
    Abstract:
    Previous studies have clearly shown that motor imagery modulates corticospinal excitability. However, there is no clear evidence for the modulation of intracortical inhibition (ICI) during imagined task performance. The aim of this study was to use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess changes in corticospinal excitability and ICI during the imagined performance of two types of task. In Experiment 1, eight subjects performed phasic depression of a computer mouse button using the dominant index finger in time with a 1 Hz auditory metronome. Single and paired pulse magnetic stimuli were delivered at rest, and during the 'on' and 'off' phases of actual and imagined task performance. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from FDI and APB. In Experiment 2, eight subjects performed phasic isometric abduction of the dominant thumb in time with a 1 Hz auditory metronome. As before, single and paired pulse magnetic stimuli were delivered at rest, and during the 'on' and 'off' phases of actual and imagined task performance. In both experiments, the conditioning stimulus intensity was set to produce 50% inhibition at rest, to enable both increases and decreases in ICI during task performance to be detected. No significant temporal or spatial modulation of MEP amplitude or ICI was observed in Experiment 1. In contrast, MEP amplitude was significantly greater, and ICI significantly lower during the 'on' phase of imagined task performance in Experiment 2. These results are most likely related to the higher levels of target muscle activation required during actual task performance and the greater anatomical distance between target and control muscles in Experiment 2. These task characteristics may influence the observed degree of corticospinal excitability and ICI modulation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]