These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [The long term (15 years) evolution after valvular replacement with mechanical prosthesis or bioprosthesis between the age of 60 and 70 years].
    Author: Hanania G, Michel PL, Montély JM, Warembourg H, Nardi O, Leguerrier A, Agnino A, Despins P, Legault B, Petit H, Bouraindeloup M, Groupe de travail sur les valvulopathies de la Société française de cardiologie.
    Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2004 Jan; 97(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15002704.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study was to document the choice between prosthesis and bioprosthesis in cases of valvular replacement during the seventh decade of life. METHODS: a retrospective and cooperative study linking eleven cardiac surgical teams and five medical cardiology teams combined 497 subjects born between 1915 and 1925 (average age 64.4 years) who underwent aortic (313 cases) or mitral (184 cases) valvular replacement with mechanical prosthesis (259 cases) or bioprosthesis (238 cases). Information was collected at each centre during the year 2000 on the long term evolution (going back 15 years), in particular on the mortality, non-fatal complications linked to the valve, cardiac complications and extra-cardiac events. These results were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: the operative mortality of this group was 4.8%. The 15 year survival was 46% for the aortic mechanical prostheses, 32% for the aortic bioprostheses (p=0.04). 34% for the mitral bioprostheses and 33% for the mitral mechanical prostheses. Events linked to the valve were more frequent for the mitral valvulopathies than for the aortic valves (49% vs 26%, p<0.001). The absence of events linked to the valve at 15 years was 69% for the aortic mechanical prostheses and 68% for the aortic bioprostheses. This was the case in only 57% of mitral mechanical prostheses and 36% of the mitral bioprostheses (p=0.11). Thromboembolic accidents were three times more frequent in the mitrals than in the aortics (11.5 vs 3.8%, p=0.002). Haemorrhage was four times more frequent for the mechanical prostheses than for the bioprostheses (7.7 vs 2%, p=0.01). The risk of degeneration for the aortic bioprostheses was 20% at 15 years, three times less so after 65 years of age (p=0.03). At 48% it was much higher in the mitral valves at 15 years with no significant difference before and after 65 years of age (p=0.3). CONCLUSION: the current life expectancy of subjects in their seventh decade is important. The greatly elevated risk of bioprosthesis degeneration in the mitral position does not allow this alternative to be advocated before 70 years of age. In the aortic position, this risk is elevated before 65 years of age. It is lower after 65 years old. Nevertheless, this means the risk of reoperation in certain octogenarians must be accepted, balanced with the linear risk of haemorrhagic accidents for which a future reduction is expected thanks to milder anticoagulation for aortic mechanical prostheses and anticoagulation autocontrol.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]