These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Side effects of endotracheal suction in pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation.
    Author: Almgren B, Wickerts CJ, Heinonen E, Högman M.
    Journal: Chest; 2004 Mar; 125(3):1077-80. PubMed ID: 15006972.
    Abstract:
    STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of endotracheal suction in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with an open suction system (OSS) or a closed suction system (CSS). DESIGN: Randomized comparison. SETTING: Animal research laboratory. PATIENTS: Twelve healthy anesthetized pigs. INTERVENTIONS: The effects of endotracheal suction during VCV and PCV with tidal volume (VT) of 14 mL/kg were compared. A 60-mm inner-diameter endotracheal tube was used. Ten-second suction was performed using OSS and CSS with 12F and 14F catheters connected to - 14 kPa vacuum. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Thirty minutes after suction in PCV, VT was still decreased by 27% (p < 0.001), compliance (Crs) by 28% (p < 0.001), and PaO(2) by 26% (p < 0.001); PaCO(2) was increased by 42% (p < 0.0001) and venous admixture by 158% (p = 0.003). Suction in VCV affected only Crs (decreased by 23%, p < 0.001) and plateau pressure (increased by 24%, p < 0.001). The initial impairment of gas exchange following suction in VCV was no longer statistically significant after 30 min. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, endotracheal suction causes lung collapse leading to impaired gas exchange, an effect that is more severe and persistent in PCV than in VCV.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]