These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Association between vascular dysfunction and reduced myocardial flow reserve in patients with hypertension: a LIFE substudy.
    Author: Olsen MH, Wachtell K, Meyer C, Hove JD, Palmieri V, Dige-Petersen H, Rokkedal J, Hesse B, Ibsen H.
    Journal: J Hum Hypertens; 2004 Jun; 18(6):445-52. PubMed ID: 15014539.
    Abstract:
    Impaired myocardial flow reserve (MFR) has been demonstrated in hypertension, and has been associated with peripheral vascular changes. We investigated whether MFR was impaired and associated with structural and/or functional vascular changes in hypertensive patients without evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). We measured left ventricular (LV) mass index by echocardiography and MFR by positron emission tomography in 33 unmedicated, hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy without CAD, and 15 age- and gender-matched normotensive subjects. We also measured 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR) by plethysmography, media:lumen ratio in isolated, subcutaneous resistance arteries by myography, intima-media cross-sectional area of the common carotid artery, and flow-mediated (FMD) and nitroglycerin-induced dilatation (NID) of the brachial artery by ultrasound. Compared to the controls, the patients had impaired MFR (2.4 (95% CI 1.95-2.8) vs 3.4 (2.7-4.2), P<0.01) due to increased resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) (0.82 (0.73-0.91) vs 0.65 (0.56-0.75) ml/g min), and decreased dipyridamole-stimulated MBF (1.80 (1.55-2.1) vs 2.3 (1.80-2.8) ml/g min, both P<0.05). The difference in resting MBF disappeared (80 (74-87) vs 86 (74-97) microl/kg mmHg, NS) when normalized for blood pressure and heart rate. MFR correlated negatively to median 24-h systolic blood pressure (r=-0.50, P<0.01) as well as to LV mass index (r=-0.45, P<0.05) and MFVR in men (r=-0.47, P<0.05), and positively to FMD (r=0.44, P<0.05) and NID (r=0.40, P<0.05). Hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy without CAD had impaired MFR associated with cardiovascular hypertrophy and vasodilatory dysfunction. This suggests that MFR is impaired by LV hypertrophy and structural/functional vascular damage in the coronary and noncoronary circulation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]