These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Anti-i causing acute hemolysis following a negative immediate-spin crossmatch.
    Author: Judd WJ, Steiner EA, Abruzzo LV, Davenport RD, Oberman HA, Pehta JC, Nance SJ.
    Journal: Transfusion; 1992; 32(6):572-5. PubMed ID: 1502712.
    Abstract:
    A unique case of acute hemolysis following transfusion of red cells (RBCs) that were found compatible by immediate-spin (IS) crossmatch technique is reported. Screening tests for unexpected antibodies, using low-ionic-strength saline (LISS), 10 minutes' incubation at 37 degrees C, and anti-IgG, were nonreactive; however, 1 transfused unit was found crossmatch incompatible by indirect antiglobulin technique (IAT). An anti-i (titer 512 at 4 degrees C) that was not an autoantibody was identified in the patient's serum. Unlike the incriminated donor RBCs, most I+ RBCs did not react by LISS-IAT. Variable reactivity was seen with ficin-treated I+ RBCs, and there was marked hemolysis of iadult and icord RBCs. In marked contrast, dominant Lu(a-b-) RBCs, with reduced expression of i, did not react by any test method; nor did autologous I+, Lu(b+) RBCs. The in vivo clinical significance of this anti-i was confirmed by monocyte monolayer assay and RBC survival studies. The patient's i antigen may have been altered, by either chemotherapy or disease, and lacked part of the i antigen-mosaic. Her antibody was directed at epitopes of i that were absent from her RBCs. Those i epitopes missing from her RBCs are also absent on dominant Lu(a-b-) RBCs. This anti-i represents a unique cause of an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction. It also represents a case of acute immune-mediated hemolysis following transfusion of IS crossmatch-compatible blood when screening tests for unexpected antibodies are nonreactive. Because of the rarity of such cases (less than 1/200,000 RBC units transfused), modifications to pretransfusion testing protocols are not proposed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]