These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Confocal microscopy evaluation of stromal ablation depth after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.
    Author: Erie JC, Hodge DO, Bourne WM.
    Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 15030819.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the measured ablation depth after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with the predicted ablation depth. SETTING: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. METHODS: Twenty-five eyes of 15 patients had PRK and 25 eyes of 15 patients had LASIK to correct refractive errors between -1.50 diopters (D) and -11.00 D. The corneas were examined by in vivo confocal microscopy before and 1 month after both procedures. Thickness measurements were obtained from digital-image analysis of confocal scans. The measured ablation depth, an estimate of the actual photoablation depth, was obtained as the surgically induced stromal thinning between the preoperative and the 1-month post-PRK or post-LASIK central stromal thickness. The predicted ablation depth was recorded from the laser's software program. RESULTS: In LASIK, the measured ablation depth (81 microm +/- 34 [SD]) was 25% greater than the predicted ablation depth (65 +/- 13 microm, P =.007) and the difference between the measured and predicted ablation depths was positively associated with the mean ablation depth (r = 0.81, P<.001). In PRK, there was no difference between the measured ablation depth (48 +/- 19 microm) and the predicted ablation depth (47 +/- 18 microm, P =.84). CONCLUSION: Significantly more tissue than predicted was removed by LASIK than by PRK excimer photoablation with the laser system used in this study.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]