These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Advantages of minimally-invasive reposition, retention, and Ilizarov-(hybrid)fixation for pilon-tibial-fractures fractures with particular emphasis on C2/C3 fractures].
    Author: Endres T, Grass R, Biewener A, Barthel S, Zwipp H.
    Journal: Unfallchirurg; 2004 Apr; 107(4):273-84. PubMed ID: 15048331.
    Abstract:
    Between October 1993 and September 1999 a total of 62 tibial pilon fractures in 59 patients were treated at the Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, Technical University Dresden. In a retrospective study 49 patients with 50 tibial pilon fractures (81%) could be examined an average of 28 months after injury. The purpose of this study was to compare clinically and radiographically the healing results obtained after using the Ilizarov technique in combination with minimally invasive internal fixation (group I) with those after a conventional surgical procedure (internal fixation with a plate, external fixation with or without minimally invasive internal fixation, and screw fixation exclusively, group II) and to evaluate the efficacy of the Ilizarov technique. Data analysis showed a significantly higher incidence of 43 C2/C3 fractures in Ilizarov group I (73%) than in group II (33.3%). Severe soft tissue injuries and particularly open injuries had a significantly higher incidence in Ilizarov group I (100%) than in group II (38%). Despite the high incidence of C2/C3 fractures and severe soft tissue injuries in group I, there was no incidence of pseudarthrosis or osteitis in the further course and there was no need for arthrodesis during the long-term course. After therapy with a conventional surgical technique, the incidence of osteitis was 5% and of delayed union of a fracture 2.5% and arthrodesis was necessary in 8%. A disadvantage of the Ilizarov system was the relatively frequent incidence of pin infection (45%) necessitating surgical debridement in 18%. The efficacy of the treatment of 43 C2/C3 fractures with the Ilizarov technique was obvious by a statistically significantly better Maryland Foot Score in comparison with group II. More than 87% of the patients treated with the Ilizarov technique and only 38% of the patients treated with a conventional surgical procedure obtained a very good or good score. According to these findings, the Ilizarov technique in combination with minimally invasive internal fixation is an effective method to treat complicated tibial pilon fractures with severe soft tissue trauma.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]