These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Group medical visits for low-income women with chronic disease: a feasibility study.
    Author: Miller D, Zantop V, Hammer H, Faust S, Grumbach K.
    Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Mar; 13(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15072736.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Group medical visits (GMVs) have been proposed as a means of providing comprehensive primary care services to patients with chronic disease. We studied the feasibility of implementing a GMV model with low-income women in an innercity clinic setting. METHODS: The intervention consisted of six GMV sessions cofacilitated by a physician/nurse practitioner team. Participants included 28 women with at least one chronic disease diagnosis (71% Latina). Thematic analysis of open-ended interviews assessed participants' experiences in the GMV. Patient charts and provider logs provided information on health service utilization patterns and provider productivity. RESULTS: An average of 7 women attended each session, with 16 women attending three or more sessions. In open-ended interviews, the most commonly mentioned positive aspects of the GMV were personalized attention (77%), self-care education (69%), access to medication refills and examinations (69%), and advice from peers (62%). Negative aspects included insufficient personal attention (23%), logistical barriers (8%), and loss of confidentiality (4%). On average, patients required 20 minutes of physician time plus 21 minutes of nurse practitioner time per session. Medical record reviews revealed a significant decrease in urgent care visits (p < 0.05) during the 9 months of the intervention compared with a prior 9-month period. CONCLUSIONS: In this innercity clinic setting, the GMV model was well tolerated by patients, did not alter provider productivity, and may have encouraged participants to avoid more expensive urgent care services. The results of this pilot study suggest that GMVs represent a cost-effective ambulatory care alternative that is acceptable to low-income women with chronic disease.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]