These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Multi-detector row CT: effect of iodine dose reduction on hepatic and vascular enhancement.
    Author: Roos JE, Desbiolles LM, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, Hilfiker PR, Marincek B, Boehm T.
    Journal: Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 15088181.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of different iodine concentrations of intravenous contrast agent on hepatic and vascular enhancement during arterial and porto-venous phase imaging using a 4-channel multi-detector row CT (MDCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients referred for triphasic abdominal MDCT were randomly assigned into four groups receiving different iodine concentration (200, 250, 300 or 350 mg/ml). Non-contrast, arterial, and porto-venous phase 4-channel MDCT imaging was performed (VolumeZoom, Siemens, Germany). A fixed volume of 150 ml intravenous contrast agent at a rate of 3 ml/s was injected using an automatic bolus-tracking system (Care Bolus, Siemens, Erlangen). Hepatic and vascular enhancement values were measured over time and non-contrast values were subtracted in order to compute arterial and porto-venous mean hepatic (MHE) and mean aortic (MAE) enhancement for each group. Mean change of enhancement > 80 HU for the aorta and > 40 HU for the liver during porto-venous phase imaging was considered as sufficient enhancement. RESULTS: All groups achieved sufficient vascular enhancement during arterial phase imaging; MAE with 350 mg/ml (222 HU) and 300 mg/ml (213HU) was significantly better than with 250 mg (196HU) and 200 mg/ml (169 HU), whereas MHE showed no statistically significant difference between the groups (range 16 - 25 HU). Porto-venous MHE showed increased enhancement with larger concentrations, with significant differences among the groups. Only the higher concentration groups (350 mg/ml und 300 mg/ml) fulfilled in every individual the guidelines for sufficient porto-venous MHE. In the lower concentration groups, 8 patients with 200 mg/ml and 3 patients with 250 mg/ml showed enhancement values below the required minimum. CONCLUSION: A decrease in iodine contrast agent down to 200 mg/ml concentration is only tenable for propose of vascular aortic and hepatic arterial enhancement, whereas hepatic porto-venous phase imaging still requires concentrations at or above the level of 300 mg/ml.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]