These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of two ultra-low-volume spray nozzle systems by using a multiple swath scenario for the aerial application of fenthion against adult mosquitoes.
    Author: Dukes J, Zhong H, Greer M, Hester P, Hogan D, Barber JA.
    Journal: J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Mar; 20(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 15088703.
    Abstract:
    Two hydraulic spray nozzle systems, a flat fan and a high-pressure hollow cone, were used for ultra-low-volume application of the mosquito adulticide fenthion under a multiple swath scheme. Eight swaths at 322-m intervals were applied from a height of 91 m to simulate operational conditions. Deposition, effects on nontarget organisms (fiddler crabs), aerial flux, and mosquito (Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus) mortality were monitored for 8,230 m downwind, including the area under all 8 swaths. The flat-fan nozzle system deposited 88 times the amount of fenthion deposited by the high-pressure system in a lightly vegetated zone directly beneath the application area (0-2,134 m). Further downwind (2,286-4,420 m) in the 2nd semiopen urban zone, 10.5 times more chemical was deposited with the flat-fan nozzles than with the high-pressure nozzles, and in the 3rd highly vegetated zone (4,572-8,230 m), 25 times more was deposited compared with high-pressure nozzles. The corresponding nontarget mortalities with the flat-fan nozzle were 80, 12, and 17% at 2,438, 3,658, and 4,572 m, respectively. No treatment-induced mortality was observed with high-pressure nozzles. Similar amounts of fenthion residue were recovered from yarn samples for both nozzle systems, with the exception of the zone directly under the flight paths, where the flat-fan system deposited 2.5 times the amount recovered with the high-pressure system. Mosquito mortality was similar between the 2 nozzle types except in the farthest zone, where the average mortalities for the high-pressure system and the flat-fan system were 73.4 and 34.8%, respectively. Regression analysis of the mosquito mortality and yarn samples showed that the high-pressure hollow-cone application could control mosquitoes with half the amount of chemical compared to flat-fan nozzles.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]