These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Retrospective analysis of vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane peeling for stage 3 and 4 macular hole.
    Author: Ben Simon GJ, Desatnik H, Alhalel A, Treister G, Moisseiev J.
    Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2004; 35(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 15088820.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy with indocyanine green (ICG)-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus pars plana vitrectomy without ILM peeling for stage 3 and 4 primary idiopathic macular hole. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two eyes of 60 consecutive patients with idiopathic macular hole underwent vitrectomy with gas (C3F8) injection. The first 46 eyes underwent vitrectomy without ILM peeling; of these, 14 had epiretinal membrane peeling and were excluded, leaving 32 eyes (no ILM group). The remaining 16 eyes underwent vitrectomy with ICG-assisted ILM peeling (ICG-ILM group). Follow-up data at 6 to 48 months postoperatively were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Macular hole closure was achieved in 13 (81%) of 16 patients in the ICG-ILM group and 16 (50%) of 32 patients in the no ILM group (P = .036). Analysis of the data from eyes with closed holes indicates that the ICG-ILM group achieved a better mean final visual acuity compared with the no ILM group (20/60 vs 20/100, respectively) (P = .017). No complications were attributed to the use of ICG. CONCLUSIONS: ICG-assisted ILM peeling significantly increased the rate of hole closure in eyes with stage 3 or 4 idiopathic macular hole. The use of ICG did not adversely affect the visual acuity results, and it appears to be a safe adjunct to macular hole surgery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]