These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Characterization of two populations of human coronary artery endothelial cells(1).
    Author: Wu H, Yao Q, Lumsden A, Chen C.
    Journal: J Surg Res; 2004 May 01; 118(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15093715.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of endothelial cells may affect angiogenesis, vascular healing, and cardiovascular disease formation. The objective of this study was to identify and characterize populations of human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs), their gene expression levels, and response to TNF-alpha stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercial HCAECs were cultured with EGM-2 complete medium. Cell population was determined by flow cytometry analysis based on size-scatter distribution. Gene expression for each population with or without TNF-alpha (1 ng/ml) stimulation for 16 h was also studied by flow cytometry analysis with proper gating and fluorescence labeling of antibodies. RESULTS: Two distinguished populations, HCAEC-I (small) and HCAEC-II (large), were identified through all passages (from 2 to 10) during cultures. Both HCAEC-I and HCAEC-II showed more than 90% positive staining for both von Willebrand factor and CD31 and were negative for CD34 and CD4 (less than 2%). HCAEC-I had substantially higher expression of cadherin-5 (71.91% versus 51.07%) than HCAEC-II. HCAEC-I also expressed much higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) (17.35% versus 0.77%), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) (44.64% versus 2.54%), VCAM-1 (6.08% versus 1.18%), E-selectin (18.68% versus 1.42%), CXCR4 (61.05% versus 7.98%), and CCR5 (48.66% versus 1.97%) than HCAEC-II. HCAEC-II, however, had substantially higher expression of P1H12 (93.07% versus 58.73%) and ICAM-1 (94.37% versus 58.62%) than HCAEC-I. Following TNF-alpha stimulation, both populations substantially increased the expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin. HCAEC-I, however, had much higher expressions of VEGFR-2, eNOS, CXCR4, and CCR-5 than HACEC-II after TNF-alpha stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that commercial HCAECs have two distinguished populations with different gene expression patterns and different responses following TNF-alpha stimulation. This study indicates that the heterogeneity of HCAECs may have biologic or pathologic significances in coronary arteries.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]