These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Mandibular remodeling measured on cephalograms: 2. A comparison of information from implant and anatomic best-fit superimpositions.
    Author: Baumrind S, Ben-Bassat Y, Korn EL, Bravo LA, Curry S.
    Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 1510047.
    Abstract:
    This study quantifies the differences in the perceived pattern of mandibular remodeling when two different methods are used to superimpose roentgenographic images of the mandible. Lateral cephalograms for a group of subjects with metallic implants of the Björk type were superimposed twice; first on the metallic implants and then independently on mandibular anatomic structures according to a common "best fit" rule. In this article, we compare the between-superimposition differences in the perceived displacements of condyle, gonion, menton, pogonion, and Point B. Mean differences between the two superimpositional techniques were smaller than had been anticipated. For the 7-year time interval between 8.5 and 15.5 years, the largest mean differences between methods were 2.70 mm in the horizontal direction at condyle, 1.90 mm in the vertical direction at condyle, and 1.52 mm in the vertical direction at gonion. None of the other between-superimposition differences had a mean value in excess of 1 mm. The individual case variability between the two methods was, however, quite considerable, a finding that we believe has bearing on the confidence that can be placed in individual case analyses in clinical orthodontics. A preliminary attempt has been made to represent and discuss the magnitude of this problem.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]