These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: An automated 'bio-intact' PTH assay: a step towards standardisation and improved correlation with parathyroid function in renal disease. Author: Savoca R, Bock A, Kraenzlin ME, Schmid HR, Huber AR. Journal: Clin Chim Acta; 2004 May; 343(1-2):167-71. PubMed ID: 15115690. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Most methods for the determination of parathyroid hormone (PTH) show cross-reactivity with N-truncated forms of PTH. The analytic and diagnostic value of a recently developed automated PTH test without this cross-reactivity was examined. METHODS: The PTH levels of 73 patients undergoing hemodialysis were compared using the 'bio-intact' PTH (Nichols Institute Diagnostics) and 3 'intact' PTH tests (from Nichols, Roche Elecsys and Diagnostics Corporation DPC). Further, the (non 1-84) PTH fragment and the PTH ratio (bio-intact PTH/(non 1-84) PTH) were calculated. All results were then correlated with biochemical bone markers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and bone collagen C-terminal telopeptides in serum). RESULTS: 'Bio-intact' PTH values were lower than the PTH results generated by the 'intact' PTH assays. Results of all PTH tests were closely correlated (r=0.96-0.98, p<0.01). Correlations with biochemical bone markers were high (r=0.31-0.63, p<0.01), but no significant association between the PTH ratio and all other tests (r=-0.2 to 0.03) was found. CONCLUSIONS: In stable hemodialysis patients, the different PTH tests show a similar correlation with the bone markers. It is however desirable to measure PTH with assays devoid of any cross-reaction for a better comparability. In this study, the PTH ratio was not correlated with biochemical bone markers; the use of this ratio requires further investigation.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]