These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
    Author: Sahiner B, Chan HP, Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Hadjiiski LM, Ramachandran A, Paramagul C, LeCarpentier GL, Nees A, Blane C.
    Journal: Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):744-54. PubMed ID: 15124991.
    Abstract:
    We are developing computer vision techniques for the characterization of breast masses as malignant or benign on radiologic examinations. In this study, we investigated the computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound (US) volumetric images. We developed 2-D and 3-D active contour models for automated segmentation of the mass volumes. The effect of the initialization method of the active contour on the robustness of the iterative segmentation method was studied by varying the contour used for its initialization. For a given segmentation, texture and morphological features were automatically extracted from the segmented masses and their margins. Stepwise discriminant analysis with the leave-one-out method was used to select effective features for the classification task and to combine these features into a malignancy score. The classification accuracy was evaluated using the area Az under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, as well as the partial area index Az(0.9), defined as the relative area under the ROC curve above a sensitivity threshold of 0.9. For the purpose of comparison with the computer classifier, four experienced breast radiologists provided malignancy ratings for the 3-D US masses. Our dataset consisted of 3-D US volumes of 102 biopsied masses (46 benign, 56 malignant). The classifiers based on 2-D and 3-D segmentation methods achieved test Az values of 0.87+/-0.03 and 0.92+/-0.03, respectively. The difference in the Az values of the two computer classifiers did not achieve statistical significance. The Az values of the four radiologists ranged between 0.84 and 0.92. The difference between the computer's Az value and that of any of the four radiologists did not achieve statistical significance either. However, the computer's Az(0.9) value was significantly higher than that of three of the four radiologists. Our results indicate that an automated and effective computer classifier can be designed for differentiating malignant and benign breast masses on 3-D US volumes. The accuracy of the classifier designed in this study was similar to that of experienced breast radiologists.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]