These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Conservative treatment in mild obstructive sleep apnea: comparison of theophylline and nasal continous positive airway pressure ventilation].
    Author: Rieger M, Di Martino E, Westhofen M.
    Journal: Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 May; 83(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 15143450.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Comparison of theophylline and nasal continous positive airway pressure-ventilation (nCPAP) in patients non eligible for surgical treatment with obstructive sleep apnea. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective non-randomized study 60 patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea were investigated. All individuals were not eligible for surgery under general anaesthesia or refused surgical treatment. The efficacy of a daily single dose oral theophylline (5 - 7 mg/kg body weight, n = 30) and nCPAP ventilation (n = 30) was evaluated by apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Statistical data analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon-Test. RESULTS: In the theophylline group 4/26 patients (15 %) showed a mean AHI reduction of 42 %. The ESS-Score improved from 10.0 to 8.0. Therapy compliance was 86 %. The non-responder (22/26 patients, 85 %) group showed a mean AHI increase of 11 % (from 24.6 to 27.3). This difference was not of statistical significance (p < or = 0.878). In the CPAP group the AHI decreased from 23.3 to 2.9 (p < or = 0,0001). Mean ventilation pressure was 6.4 mbar. The ESS-Score improved from 10 to 8. Compliance was 50 %. Six of thirty patients (20 %) did not use the CPAP device regularly. During the first four weeks another nine of thirty (30.7 %) patients turned back the device. Main reasons were discomfort (61 %), noise (38 %), rhinitis, conjunctivitis and discomfort of the partner (10 %). CONCLUSIONS: None of the treatments investigated can be considered as a substantial alternative for the majority of patients non eligible for surgery. Theophylline has a high compliance but little therapeutic effect. CPAP-ventilation is more effective but has a compliance problem in the patients investigated. Both modalities may have benefit but have to be individually indicated. A multimodal approach may ease the problem.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]