These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of masker component phase on the forward masking produced by complex tones in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Author: Moore BC, Stainsby TH, Tarasewicz E.
    Journal: Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15157967.
    Abstract:
    For normally hearing subjects, harmonic complex tones that give "peaky" waveforms on the basilar membrane (Schroeder-positive phase, sine phase or cosine phase) lead to less forward masking than complex tones that give less peaky waveforms (Schroeder-negative phase or random phase), but have the same power spectrum. This difference has been attributed mainly to the combined effects of peripheral compression and suppression, both of which depend on the operation of the active mechanism in the cochlea. If this explanation is correct, the phase effect should be reduced or absent for subjects with moderate cochlear hearing loss. We measured growth-of-masking functions for forward maskers containing the first 40 harmonics of a 100-Hz fundamental, with components added either in cosine phase or random phase, using both normally hearing subjects and subjects with moderate cochlear hearing loss. The signal frequency was 1 or 2 kHz. For the normally hearing subjects, the mean slopes of the growth-of-masking functions at 1 and 2 kHz, respectively, were 0.53 and 0.44 for the random-phase masker and 0.31 and 0.26 for the cosine-phase masker. For high masker levels, the former produced considerably more masking than the latter. The phase effect was smaller for the hearing-impaired than for the normally hearing subjects, which is consistent with the idea that it is partly caused by peripheral compression and suppression. However, three of the five hearing-impaired subjects showed a significant effect of masker phase for at least one signal frequency. In one case, this occurred when the hearing loss at the signal frequency was 65 dB. The slopes of the growth-of-masking functions were consistently less than one for the hearing-impaired subjects. Further testing suggested that the efferent system was not involved in producing the phase effect.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]