These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Inter-laboratory comparison of qualitative and quantitative detection of hepatitis C (HCV) virus RNA in diagnostic virology: a multicentre study (MS) in Italy.
    Author: Mancini C, Pisani G, Azzi A, Luisa Zerbini M, Gentili G, Mario Bisso G, MS participants.
    Journal: J Clin Virol; 2004 Aug; 30(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 15163420.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The importance of the standardisation of nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) assays for the detection of hepatitis C virus RNA is well known today, as many studies carried out in different European countries attest. The results of a previous study performed in Italy (J. Clin. Virol. 1 (2003) 83) by the Italian Society of Clinical Microbiology (AMCLI) showed that the use of external reference standards and of multicentre collaborative studies significantly improves laboratory performance for the qualitative evaluation of HCV RNA. OBJECTIVES: the AMCLI organised a new study on the standardisation of both the qualitative and the quantitative evaluation of HCV RNA with NAT in order to improve the implementation of the diagnostic methods for HCV RNA detection. STUDY DESIGN: seventeen diagnostic centres of major Italian Hospitals participated in this quality control study. The study consisted of testing three panels, each made up of 10 coded samples including negative and positive samples. Positive samples contained four levels of HCV RNA (genotype 1). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Seven out of 510 qualitative results obtained were incorrect (1.4%), two false negative and five false positive. The results gave a sensitivity of 99.5% and a specificity of 95.8%. Regarding quantitative tests, the geometric mean (GM) and standard deviation (S.D.) could be calculated only for the three highest HCV RNA levels. The percentage of results within the range of GM +/- 0.5 log(10) varied from 91% to 100%. Some laboratories had some difficulty in the exact quantification of the lowest (3.00 log IU/ml) as well as of the highest viral levels (6.35 log IU/ml) values, very near to the limits of the dynamic range of the assays. The comparison of the results of this study with that previously carried out one confirms that a regular participation in external quality assessment (EQA) assures the achievement of a high proficiency level in the diagnosis of HCV infection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]