These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: In vitro selection of drug-resistant varicella-zoster virus (VZV) mutants (OKA strain): differences between acyclovir and penciclovir? Author: Andrei G, De Clercq E, Snoeck R. Journal: Antiviral Res; 2004 Mar; 61(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 15168799. Abstract: Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) mutants were isolated under the pressure of different classes of antiviral compounds: (i) drugs that depend on the viral thymidine kinase (TK) for their activation, i.e. acyclovir (ACV), brivudin (BVDU), penciclovir (PCV) and sorivudine (BVaraU); (ii) drugs that are independent of the viral TK for their activation, i.e. 2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl (PME) derivatives of adenine (PMEA, adefovir) and 2,6-diaminopurine (PMEDAP); and (iii) drugs that do not require any metabolism to inhibit the viral DNA polymerase, i.e. foscarnet (PFA). Drug-resistant virus strains were obtained by serial passage of the OKA strain in human embryonic lung (HEL) fibroblasts and the different drug-resistant mutants were subsequently evaluated for their in vitro susceptibility to a broad range of antiviral drugs. Virus strains emerging under the pressure of ACV, BVDU and BVaraU were cross-resistant to all drugs that depend on the viral TK for activation, but remained susceptible to the acyclic nucleoside phosphonates (i.e. PMEA, PMEDAP and the 3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl derivatives of adenine (HPMPA) and cytosine (HPMPC, cidofovir)) and PFA. In contrast, the virus strains selected under pressure of PCV were resistant to PCV, ACV, PMEA and PFA; but not BVDU, BVaraU, GCV, HPMPC or HPMPA. Similar patterns of drug susceptibility were noted for the virus strains selected under the pressure of PMEA or PFA, pointing to an alteration in the viral DNA polymerase as basis for the resistant phenotype selected by PCV, as well as PMEA and PFA. In contrast, the resistant phenotype selected by ACV as well as BVDU and BVaraU may be attributed primarily to mutations in the viral TK gene. Our data thus indicate that ACV and PCV select in vitro for different drug-resistant VZV phenotypes; whether this is also the situation in vivo remains to be investigated.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]