These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Variable parathyroid hormone(1-84)/carboxylterminal PTH ratios detected by 4 novel parathyroid hormone assays.
    Author: Koller H, Zitt E, Staudacher G, Neyer U, Mayer G, Rosenkranz AR.
    Journal: Clin Nephrol; 2004 May; 61(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 15182128.
    Abstract:
    AIM: Parathyroidhormone (PTH) measurement is important in the evaluation of bone disease in patients with chronic renal failure. Large carboxyl-terminal PTH fragments (C-PTH) cross-react with second-generation PTH assays, lead to an overestimation of biologically active PTH, and are evaluated by a combination of second- and third-generation PTH assays. The aim of our study was to examine whether the use of 4 different PTH assays of putatively same specificity leads to comparable results detecting C-PTH fragments. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 70 chronic dialysis patients, total PTH and PTH(1-84) were measured in parallel by 4 novel PTH assays (Nichols Advantage Intact PTH and Bio-Intact PTH Chemiluminescence Assay, Nichols Institute Diagnostics, USA, DUO Total and CAP PTH IRMA, Scantibodies Laboratory, USA). The C-PTH concentration was quantitated by subtracting PTH(1-84) from total PTH. Consecutively, the PTH(1-84)/C-PTH ratio was calculated. RESULTS: Nichols Intact PTH and DUO Total PTH assays were highly correlated (r = 0.985), as well as Nichols Bio-Intact and DUO CAP assays (r = 0.984). However, total PTH values measured by the Nichols assay were 30% higher (median (range): 185 (9.9 - 2,332) versus 130 (2.3 - 1,271.1) pg/ml, p < 0.01). PTH(1-84) values, measured by the Nichols Bio-Intact PTH assay were 8% higher compared to the Scantibodies CAP assay (median (range): 79.6 (7.5 - 1,060.9) versus 73.7 (4.4 - 918.9) pg/ml, p = NS). Thirty-six patients had a ratio < 1 measured by the Nichols assays, whereas only 8 patients showed the same ratio when measured by the Scantibodies assays. In 28 patients (40%), contradictory PTH(1-84)/C-PTH ratios were found, showing a ratio < 1 when measured by the Nichols assays, but > 1 when the Scantibodies assays were used. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results suggest that the PTH(1-84)/C-PTH ratio cannot be equally used as a predictor of bone turnover when different PTH assays are used. Depending on those assays, differences in total PTH values mathematically lead to varying amounts of C-PTH fragments resulting in variable, even contradictory PTH(1-84)/C-PTH ratios.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]