These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of five different filters for the removal of leukocytes from red cell concentrates.
    Author: Pietersz RN, Steneker I, Reesink HW, Dekker WJ, Al EJ, Huisman JG, Biewenga J.
    Journal: Vox Sang; 1992; 62(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 1519371.
    Abstract:
    The leukocyte depletion capacity and performance of 5 filters designed for filtration of red cell concentrates (RCC) were compared by counting leukocytes, measuring red cell volumes and by histological examination of the filters after use. To eliminate interdonor differences, 5 buffy-coat-poor RCC were pooled (in each of 10 experiments) and subsequently split up into the original bags. The RCC were passed over the Cellselect filter, a column filled with cellulose acetate, and over flat-bed polyester filters: the Cellselect Optima, the Pall RC 50, the Leukostop and the Sepacell R-500. The filtration was shortest with the Pall RC 50 (p less than 0.001 compared to the other 4 filters). Leukocyte removal was most effective with the cellulose acetate filter (p less than 0.01 compared to the other 4 filters) followed by the Cellselect Optima polyester filter (p less than 0.02 compared to the remaining 3 filters). Residual leukocytes did not exceed 50 x 10(6) for any brand of filter. Red cell recovery was similar for all 5 filters with mean values from 86.1 to 89.2%. The leukocyte numbers, counted in Türk's solution or in propidium iodide, gave comparable values in hemocytometers applying light microscopy or fluorescent microscopy, respectively. Histological examination showed that lymphocytes were mainly removed by trapping, whereas granulocytes showed a variable pattern: adhesion in presence of platelets or trapping.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]