These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Prevalence of malnutrition in liver transplant candidates. Author: Zaina FE, Parolin MB, Lopes RW, Coelho JC. Journal: Transplant Proc; 2004 May; 36(4):923-5. PubMed ID: 15194318. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of malnutrition among liver transplant (LT) candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study evaluated 219 adult LT candidates including 141 men and 78 women. Cholestatic disease was present in 21 (Child: A = 1, B = 11, and C = 9) and noncholestatic disease in 198 (Child: A = 12, B = 93, and C = 93. The mean age was respectively 45.6 and 46.5 years. Anthropometric and biochemical assessments were performed for statistical analysis using Student t test (P <.05). RESULTS: In the noncholestatic group, 41.5% were obese according to keep a body mass index (BMI); 61.6% were depleted according to adequacy of tricipital skin fold (%TSF); and 71.1% were above normal levels for generalized adipose reserve (%F). In terms of adequacy of mid-upper arm muscle circumference (%MMC), 58% were depleted and 50.5% were depleted for the current body weight/usual body weight (%CBW/UBW). Otherwise 52.2% of current body weight/ideal body weight (%CBW/IBW) values were above normal. Serum albumin was below normal in 64.9% of cases. In the cholestatic group 62% were normal for BMI; 66.7% were depleted for %TSF; 77.8% were above normal for %F. As to %MMC, 47.6% were depleted and 47.6% were depleted for %CBW/UBW. Otherwise 47.6% were above normal weight for %CBW/IBW. Serum albumin was below normal in 53.9% and %MMC values showed statistically significant differences (P =.02) when compared with Child B and C in the noncholestatic group, as well as %F (P =.01) and serum albumin (P =.0002) in the cholestatic and noncholestatic groups. Serum albumin values also showed statistically significant differences (P =.0004) when noncholestatic Child B and C patients were compared. CONCLUSION: Patients with cholestatic disease were more affected by calorie depletion compared to noncholestatic patients who were more affected by protein depletion.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]