These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effect of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin on the myoelectric activity of the duodenum in weaned pigs. Author: Yao G, Woliński J, Zabielski R. Journal: J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med; 2004 Apr; 51(3):106-12. PubMed ID: 15214849. Abstract: The objective of the present study was to elucidate the effect of subclinical doses of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) on the antro-duodenal myoelectric activities of weaned pigs. Twelve weaned pigs were surgically implanted with three pairs of electrodes on the antrum 3 cm before the pylorus, 5 and 20 cm after the pylorus on the duodenum, respectively. An infusion cannula was inserted into the duodenum between duodenal electrodes. Using a wireless telemetry recording system, an electromyography (EMG) tracing lasting at least 24 h was recorded as the control, then another 24-h EMG recording was performed with a bolus intraduodenal infusion of LT (0.1 and 0.5 microg/kg b.w.). After a 1- to 2-day break, a 5-fold higher dose of LT was administered using the same protocol. In the antrum, LT administration barely modified the EMG signal. However, in the duodenum it prolonged the duration of phase II and the migrating myoelectric complex (MMC) cycle when compared with the control. The number of duodenal MMC cycles was also significantly diminished. Moreover, the migrating velocity of phase III was increased. The migrating action potential complex (MAPC) was present both without and with LT, but occurred more frequently following LT administration. In conclusion, LT caused a dose-dependent, lagged alteration in the duodenal MMC in weaned pigs, involving a reduction of the MMC number by lengthening phase II, increased phase III migration velocity, and increased MAPC frequency. The disturbances did not, however, result in diarrhoea and may reflect the induction of a local protection mechanism of the gut to expel unwanted foreign content from the lumen of the upper gut.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]