These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of the seroepidemiology of chlamydial infection in pigeon fanciers and farmers in the U.K.
    Author: Bourke SJ, Carrington D, Frew CE, McSharry CP, Boyd G.
    Journal: J Infect; 1992 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():91-8. PubMed ID: 1522344.
    Abstract:
    A detailed comparative seroepidemiological study of antibody responses was performed in 271 pigeon fanciers and 100 farmers. Overall 73% of pigeon fanciers had IgG antibodies at a titre greater than or equal to 16 to Chlamydia pneumoniae, 39% to Chlamydia psittaci, and 6.6% to Chlamydia trachomatis. The prevalence of chlamydial antibodies was significantly lower in the farmers at 47% for C. pneumoniae, 6% for C. psittaci, and 2% for C. trachomatis. Both populations were exposed to complex microbiological and antigenic environments: 50.5% of the pigeon fanciers had antibodies to pigeon antigens, 34% to egg membrane, and 0.73% to yolk sac antigen, and 59% of the farmers had antibodies to Micropolyspora faeni, but the high prevalence of chlamydial antibodies could not be attributed to interaction with these antigens. There was considerable overlap of chlamydial antibody responses in the pigeon fanciers but not in the farmers: 36% of the pigeon fanciers had antibodies to C. pneumoniae alone, 5% to C. psittaci alone, and 31% to both agents, whereas only 3% of farmers had antibodies to both C. pneumoniae and C. psittaci. The high prevalence of antibodies to C. psittaci in the pigeon fanciers is compatible with the known avian reservoir for this infection. The particularly high prevalence of antibodies to C. pneumoniae suggests that complex interactions may be occurring in a population exposed to two chlamydial organisms, whereby infection with one species may provoke an anamnestic response against other chlamydial organisms with which the subject has previously been infected.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]