These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Clinical performance measurement in surgery and orthopedics -- new aspects in 2004].
    Author: Döbler K, Mohr VD.
    Journal: Zentralbl Chir; 2004 Jun; 129(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 15237319.
    Abstract:
    In 2004, principles and practice of clinical performance measurement (CPM) in German hospitals were changed according to new legislative and administrative regulations. In many respects, focus and methods of clinical performance measurement were improved in favour of hospitals. Starting from January 1, 2004, the new Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (Joint Federal Board) has competence for decisions on future focus and scope of CPM. Former agreements on implementation of CPM in 2004 will be effective as long as Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss passes new resolutions. Methods to identify relevant cases for CPM particularly changed in 2004. Until end of 2003, obligations to report case data were based on special types of hospital reimbursement. In 2004, obligations for reporting no longer derive from financial criteria, but from medical criteria such as diagnoses and procedures. In 2003, reporting for CPM covered more than 30 subjects in medicine and nursing. For 2004, the scope of CPM has been reduced by 13 subjects which need to be reconsidered in order to secure unified quality goals for out-patients as well as in-patients and to allow long-term follow-up of outcome data. For their CPM expenditure, hospitals receive an additional fee of euro 0.58 per case reimbursed by DRG. Financial sanctions will be effective for hospitals with overall CPM reporting rates below 80 %. Starting from 2005, hospitals are obliged to publish CPM reporting rates for each CPM subject in annual hospital quality reports.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]