These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Intravenous fleroxacin versus ceftazidime for lower respiratory tract and skin and soft-tissue infections.
    Author: Huston MJ, Lentino JR.
    Journal: Clin Ther; 1992; 14(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 1525793.
    Abstract:
    Fleroxacin, a new quinolone antimicrobial agent, was evaluated as part of a multicenter, comparative, open-label, randomized trial with ceftazidime in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections and skin and soft-tissue infections. After written informed consent was obtained, 20 patients were entered at our center. Twelve patients were assigned to the fleroxacin group; 6 in each infection category. Of these 12 patients, 2 with pneumonia and 3 with skin and soft-tissue infection were not clinically evaluable. The mean duration of therapy was 5.7 +/- 3.0 days in the fleroxacin group versus 7.9 +/- 2.0 days in the ceftazidime group. The gram-positive organisms responsible for those infections not evaluable were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and group F streptococcus, all of which were resistant to fleroxacin. In total, 6 gram-positive isolates were resistant to fleroxacin. All but 2 S aureus isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime. Adverse reactions in both groups were negligible. Fleroxacin was found to be as effective as ceftazidime against a variety of gram-negative pathogens, but local susceptibility patterns for quinolones should be checked before empiric use of fleroxacin against gram-positive pathogens such as streptococci.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]