These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of zolpidem versus diazepam and placebo on breathing control parameters in healthy human subjects.
    Author: Maillard D, Thiercelin JF, Fuseau E, Rosenzweig P, Attali P.
    Journal: Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 1992; 12(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 1526696.
    Abstract:
    The following study explores the possibility that zolpidem, a new hypnotic agent derived from imidopyridine, may induce changes in ventilatory function in normal subjects. The study, conducted double-blind on 16 subjects (eight men and eight women, aged 21 to 33 years) was undertaken in two successive phases: phase A with a cross-over, intended to compare the ventilatory effects of 10 mg oral dose of diazepam with a placebo, and then phase B, with a Latin square design, intended to compare the effects of 10 and 20 mg oral doses of zolpidem with 10 mg oral doses of diazepam and a placebo. Central inspiratory drive was assessed by occlusion pressure (P0.1) and breathing pattern in air and during carbon dioxide rebreathing. Measurements were performed one and three hours after each drug or placebo administration. Zolpidem did not affect tidal volume (Vt), slopes S1, S2 or P0.1, but decreased the duration of the phases of the respiratory cycle ti by 14% (p less than 0.01) and ttot by 15% (p = 0.03) after three hours post dosing without any change in ventilation, Vt/ti or ti/ttot. Nevertheless, these timing changes, although statistically significant, seem to have no clinical relevance to overall ventilation regulation in normal subjects. On the other hand, diazepam slightly changed S2 at three hours post dosing (0.14 +/- 0.07 versus 0.17 +/- 0.10 after the placebo; p = 0.06) without modifying the other parameters.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]